Home > General > L322 is bigger than L405 |
|
|
Mark6r Member Since: 25 Jun 2012 Location: South Lanarkshire Posts: 90 |
Certainly looks bigger in the pics but after driving one on Friday at the landrover experience in dunkeld both on and off road the l405 is certainly wider never notice the difference in length. What a difference between 3.6 and the new 4.4, need to get a drive in a 4.4 l322 as these look much better value.
|
||
2nd Sep 2013 9:45pm |
|
campaj1 Member Since: 22 Oct 2012 Location: Cheshire Posts: 729 |
ahh that's chester isn't it?! I've often parked there: Grosvenor car park, or is it tescoes? I'm only in a nearby village so know that view well!
|
||
2nd Sep 2013 9:47pm |
|
Mustard Member Since: 25 Jun 2013 Location: North of South Posts: 299 |
Unnecessary quote removed
|
||
2nd Sep 2013 9:51pm |
|
campaj1 Member Since: 22 Oct 2012 Location: Cheshire Posts: 729 |
a bit sad of me to spot that! always plenty of FFRRs at the top of that car park, the spaces are ridiculously small |
||
2nd Sep 2013 9:52pm |
|
Mustard Member Since: 25 Jun 2013 Location: North of South Posts: 299 |
Yes from what I could see from being alongside it the L405 is fractionally longer and I would say thats only due to the rounded front bumper / saggy behind. I like the 2012 L322 look, really nice and still with presence I do like the sound of throwing these around when there somebody else's, do you have to pay or get invited to the land rover experiences ? |
||
2nd Sep 2013 9:56pm |
|
campaj1 Member Since: 22 Oct 2012 Location: Cheshire Posts: 729 |
i got to do it out at peckforton, there are often unwanted xmas presents etc on ebay i'll pm you to say what i paid |
||
2nd Sep 2013 9:58pm |
|
Mustard Member Since: 25 Jun 2013 Location: North of South Posts: 299 |
Yes and they are also stupidly spaced with them dam concrete columns, cant get the ff parked and manage to get out of it without damaging something, Ive noticed ff drivers either park them on the 1st level outside or all the way at the top
|
||
2nd Sep 2013 10:01pm |
|
campaj1 Member Since: 22 Oct 2012 Location: Cheshire Posts: 729 |
ugh it is frustrating! I also realised recently that it cost me less to park in Monaco this summer than it does on Pepper Street |
||
2nd Sep 2013 10:04pm |
|
Philip Member Since: 05 Jan 2010 Location: UK Posts: 2564 |
Does make you wonder if they never put them side-by-side. L405 could nearly be Korean - looks almost apologetic, but in a flashier way. The old one is a far more successful design. |
||
2nd Sep 2013 10:25pm |
|
campaj1 Member Since: 22 Oct 2012 Location: Cheshire Posts: 729 |
The L322 is timeless, the L405 isn't. LR clearly got stuck in a rut thinking about weight saving, fuel efficiency and stylistic trinkets, and lost their way in the process. The aerodynamic wheelarches and smooth nose may gain 1-2 MPG, but they also compromise the bluff design language. Likewise saving weight with aluminium, which produces huge A,B, C and D pillars on the car, compromising the 'glass house' feel and 'command' driving position. So too the smaller C pillar window, which ruins the visual balance of said glass area. The lights, meanwhile, are adorned with fripperies, and the aforementioned flared wheelarches result in a track totally unsuited to British roads, and indeed serious off-roading.
|
||
2nd Sep 2013 11:06pm |
|
XXXAngelXXX Member Since: 25 Mar 2007 Location: Stuttgart Posts: 4994 |
+ you forgot to mention that there is less space on the front seats in the L405 .... All my spelling errorz are belong to me!
|
||
3rd Sep 2013 6:41am |
|
Stephen.125 Member Since: 25 Jun 2009 Location: Frodsham Posts: 1511 |
Haha re: Grosvenor; only place I've had my car (BMW before the full fat) keyed.
|
||
3rd Sep 2013 9:16am |
|
campaj1 Member Since: 22 Oct 2012 Location: Cheshire Posts: 729 |
XXXAngel true!
|
||
3rd Sep 2013 11:51am |
|
NormanP Member Since: 15 Mar 2013 Location: Oxford Posts: 136 |
Yes the L405 is wider (2220mm v 2190 so 3cm wider; with mirrors folded 2073mm versus 2010 so 6 cm wider, due to the new much chunkier mirrors). I park on a narrow driveway and it was noticeable at first, but soon got used to it. The 322 is not much taller (1840 v 1835mm at normal height setting) so I wonder if the 405 in the pic was lowered to access height? I have just gone from a 322 to a 405 (3.0TDV6) and great so far: I moved from a 2002 model to a 2013 though, so quite a leap in terms of features. And I am sure the 4.4 405 is lovely but the 3.0 seems to do all I want, I don’t need the power for thrills as I have another car for that. It's consuming fuel at half the rate of my old petrol 4.4V8, is faster, and is just a lovely place to be. Very happy. And if anyone really thinks the 322 is still much better, well mine is up for sale . Norman
|
||
3rd Sep 2013 1:50pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis